Trust me. He'll be back. You know who I'm talking about. He just doesn't want to go to training camp. As soon as late August rolls around, he'll have a change of heart and explain that he "just couldn't stay away because [he] loves the game too much." Substitute "attention" for "game" in your mind, of course, when he says that in subsequent interviews.
If you want to throw up all over the place read this.
MLB.com's Bryan Hoch examines the curious case of Derek Jeter's 2009 resurgence at baseball - particularly his defensive numbers. I think the following article supports a pair of postulates:
1. The "Derek Jeter is bad at defense" debate will continue to rage as a corresponding countercurrent to all the adulation he currently gets from the press for being clutch and a leader and such.
2. Baseball players, famously undereducated, are nevertheless managed by a group of executives who are increasingly statistically-savvy. It seems like this causes a bit of resentment.
Interestingly, Hoch interviewed some of the Yankees' brass for the article. Then, he went and got Jeter's own opinion. Here's the text:
It was last spring that Derek Jeter offered dismissive smirks to a small gathering in front of his locker at the Yankees' Spring Training complex. He chose his words carefully, but expressed clear skepticism regarding a statistical study that pegged him as the worst defensive shortstop in the big leagues.
Well, there's Bill James' very interesting analysis. This, by the way, is based not just on a bunch of numbers but on an analysis of 40 video replays of Jeter vs. Adam Everett.
There's also reports of a study done at UPenn which concluded, after analyzing every ball put into play from 2002 to 2005, that Jeter was the worst defensive shortstop. By the way, some of the quotes from that NY Post article are worth reprinting:
"I don't know what they're smoking down at Penn," said Yankees fan Mike Birch, 32. "That's preposterous. I completely disagree. Jeter's a clutch player. [dan-bob's note: I did not fabricate this quotation]"
"It's ridiculous," said fan Jay Ricker, 22. "Jeter is all-around awesome. He's better than A-Rod any day. Character has a lot to do with it. He's out there for his teammates, not just himself. He does it for the good of the team. That's the kind of guy you want on the field."
"He has intangible qualities that can't be measured with statistics," said East Village bar owner Kevin Hooshangi, 28.
"He's he ultimate teammate. It doesn't matter what his percentages are when he's making big plays in big games. He's the one with four World Series rings."
... awesome.
Jeter didn't buy into that brand of defensive analysis then, and he still doesn't.
Interesting that after Jeter's boss made him change his workout routine based on statistical evidence, and after that routine has helped him become a better defensive shortstop, he still doesn't believe in it. Stats to Jeter are like dinosaur bones to Carl Everett: they're only there to confuse you.
But Jeter had another reason not to worry about the data that computer programs had spit out concerning his fielding ability: Upon recommendation from the Yankees, Jeter had already started working to improve his range and mobility.
About time! The Yanks saw some improvement in 2008, and as Jeter's second full season under the new conditioning program passes the midway point, the numbers are again focused on one of their favorite subjects. But this time, the raw data claims that Jeter, 35, is playing his best defensive baseball since he was in his 20s.
Good old raw data.
"You have to make adjustments throughout the years, and if things don't go the way you want them to go or you don't feel the way you want to feel, you make adjustments in order to compensate for it," Jeter said. "I just wanted to be healthy; that's it."
Right: and the adjustments you made were a direct result of your team's statistical analysis of your poor defense. I like how Jeter minimizes the whole thought process behind this by claiming "I just wanted to be healty" - even though he was never injured. The pivotal conversation with team brass took place after the '07 season, when it had become clear to Yankees general manager Brian Cashman and his staff that his shortstop's defense was an issue that needed to be addressed.
Obviously.
"Whatever weaknesses we may see develop in our players, we talk to our players about it," Cashman said. "We look for ways to attack it. He changed his workout routine to improve his lateral defense, and that took place before last year. He's been better the last two years."
Gosh, what a sensible thing to do. Good work there, Cashman!
According to FanGraphs.com, a sabermetric analysis Web site, Jeter's 2007 Ultimate Zone Rating (or UZR) was -15.3, projecting that Jeter cost the Yankees 15.3 more runs than the average Major League shortstop over the 155 games in which he played. That ranked worst among American Leaguers.
Ouch. No matter what your opinion of UZR is... that's some bad defense there.
"I don't really sit around and look at that," Jeter said. "You can criticize -- everyone gets criticized. I don't pay attention to it. If someone wants to write an article, let them write it. It doesn't really matter to me. My job is to come out here and to improve and try to help this team win. That's all I've been doing. All the other stuff, I don't pay attention to."
That's probably a healthy attitude for a major leaguer to take. God knows anyone would go nuts reading about themselves. But Jeter could be a little less ignorant and admit that the statistical analysis of his defense contributed to his new workout regimen that has improved his defense.
But Jeter -- who claims to not even use the Internet
... awesome. Also, I bet he's full of shit. Everyone uses the internet at some point.
-- isn't about to crunch his own numbers to check up.
Maybe because the last time he took a math class was Algebra II in like 1992?
He still turns a quizzical eye toward an analysis performed at the University of Pennsylvania, which read every ball put in play between 2005 and 2007 and labeled him at the bottom of the pack.
I wonder what grounds Jeter might cite to suggest some sort of invalidity to the studies done at UPenn.
"You can't sit around and figure out a defensive chart on somebody," Jeter said. "I mean, that's impossible to do, so I don't pay attention to it. There's different pitchers, different hitters, different runners and different people playing different positions. You cannot do it."
Well, that's settled.
"Everybody doesn't play the same position, everybody doesn't get hit the same ground ball, everyone doesn't have the same runner. So you can't figure out a mathematical equation on it. If Ichiro hits a ball in the same spot that a slower runner does, how can you compute that in a computer? You can't do it."
Well, you don't have to, Mr. Jeter. That's what's great about taking large sample sizes (like, for example every single groundball from 2005 to 2007). There are a few Ichiros in there, but there are also a few Prince Fielders and some Bengie Molinas. Overall, looking at the thousands of ground balls you fielded during those years, Derek, it doesn't really matter that Ichiro exists.
You don't have to compute it in a computer, either.
[bunch of stories about Jeter working on his defense in the minors are omitted due to the fact that they are boring]
With the next statistical study no doubt already in the works, Jeter will continue to pick his spots to discuss his defense.
I hope the stats continue to tell us how good players are, instead of being completely irrelevant. Fortunately, I think they will!
But with more pep on the bases -- he has already stolen 18 bases, his highest total since 2006 -- it seems clear that Jeter has found a new gear to work with.
"People always try to overanalyze things," Jeter said. "I mean, sometimes, some years, you may feel better than other years. That's pretty much it. I think people always try to figure out, 'Well, what's the reason?' I just feel good. I just think there's really not much more than that."
Well, Derek, you might attribute it to "just feeling good" - but I think the rest of this article, including the direct evidence of your general manager - suggests that the statistically-informed training program you're on, which works to increase lateral movement, has been the primary cause of your resurgent defense.
But maybe you're just feeling good. Yep.
Rachel Nichols with a fascinating update (current as of 3 PM EST Monday)!
Brett Favre continues to wrestle with a decision on whether to come out of retirement, agent Bus Cook told ESPN's Rachel Nichols on Monday.
I think you mean "wrassle" with a decision. Also, if there's one person in professional sports who deserves to be attacked by an even angrier swarm of bees than Brett Favre, it's Bus Cook.
Favre told The Associated Press earlier this month that he'll give the Minnesota Vikings an answer on whether he'll play by the July 30 start of training camp.
Does anyone actually take this guy at his word anymore? How the fuck could you? How could you watch what he's done in the press over the course of the past, say, three years, and believe a single thing he says? Preaching to the choir, I know.
At issue for Favre is whether he's really up to the mental and physical requirements of a long season in which he'll turn 40 years old.
Also at issue are the number of happy endings he can negotiate out of Peter King and company.
The quarterback's friends and family say they are leaving this decision solely up to him and will be supportive no matter which way he goes.
I wish just one of them would crack him a good one right across the face and shout "YOU'RE A HORRIBLE PERSON. GET OVER YOURSELF AND EITHER PLAY OR DON'T. DECIDE RIGHT THIS SECOND. NOW. NOW NOW NOW." /slapslapslapslapslap
"AND DON'T YOU EVER FUCKING TALK TO THE MEDIA AGAIN."
In the meantime Favre is poking some fun at his own indecisiveness in a new advertisement for Sears that will run in September. Cook told ESPN that Favre shot the ad last Monday.
God help us all. I'd rather hear "saved by zero" incessantly for five more months.
Rachel Nichols is a reporter for ESPN.
Go have her report on something, then.
Hey, ever wondered what Terrell Owens thinks about stuff going on around the NFL which is completely unrelated to him or the team he plays for? Of course you did! He's the foremost authority on everything. For example, recently he said during a press conference that he doesn't think Mike Vick should face an NFL suspension once reinstated because Vick already spent almost two years in prison. Four minutes of Sportscenter were devoted to this, and I think we can all agree that that is an appropriate amount of time to devote to a know-nothing dipshit loudmouth team killing sociopath's opinions.
Unfortunately, during that press conference TO failed to address Brett Favre's situation. But as soon as he says something about it- because as we just agreed, anything TO says about anything is completely valid and worthy of media coverage- we will be sure to update you. In the meantime I think I'll rampantly speculate that TO thinks Favre is a great quarterback, but should only play this season if he really feels like he's physically and mentally capable of doing so.
You heard it here first, people. TO probably thinks Brett Favre should probably play this season. Probably. Maybe. Back to PNoles with more round-the-clock coverage of what's going on outside Brett Favre's house.
Brett Favre's throwing motion is "OK".
We'll now take you back to Larry's live coverage, already in progress.
Since we so rarely talk about this kind of thing here at FireJay, I thought people might want to know that Favre worked out with a local high school team near his home in Mississippi yesterday. ESPN's Ed Werder reported that the workout went "well," but that Favre was no closer to deciding what he will do this coming fall than he was the last time Werder had asked. Which was 6 hours earlier.
Updates as events warrant. Everyone see PNoles' most recent post for more substantive analysis.
Applause to msnbc.com, nfl.com, foxsports.com, and cbssportsline.com, all of whom seem to understand that news isn't news unless something has actually happened.
Sorry for postblocking, pnoles.
Read the following article. It's about the tactical differences between Jim Tracy and Clint Hurdle.
Just kidding. The article doesn't contain any actual news or information at all.
Sorry to obscure the importance of what you had to say, Larry.
Sorry to bury your post, PNoles, but I just heard on ESPN that Brett Favre may or may not want to play for the Vikings next year. He hasn't made up his mind yet, and will only do so as soon as every media outlet on the planet is giving him the attention he so desperately craves.
OK, sorry again. Everyone go read PNoles' post immediately below this one, in which he talks about someone on the Cubs bowling a perfect game. Nice story. Very uplifting.
As most of you know, Mark Buehrle threw a perfect game on Thursday. I know it's happened about 4,421 times before, but still kind of a big deal. I woke up on Friday morning, excited to watch the beginning of SC on ESPN to get a look at the highlights.
First story: Brett Favre having some misgivings about returning to play for the Vikings.
Second story: Michael Vick will find out next week whether he will be reinstated into the NFL.
After spending 5 minutes apiece on these two "stories" we hit White Sox / Rays.
It's like ESPN is a 15-year-old girl, and Brett Favre is her overly dramatic best friend.
FUCK YOU ESPN.
