And ESPN's Ashley Fox is definitely a bozo.
It is award season in the National Football League.
The part of the year where NFL writers and commentators devote 100% of their time to mind-numbing bullshit meaningless analysis of nothing, as opposed to the rest of the year, during which they only devote 90% of their time to mind-numbing bullshit meaningless analysis of nothing.
Can an interim coach take home coach of the year?
WHAT WILL IT SAY ABOUT US AS A SOCIETY IF ONE DOES?
Which dazzling quarterback will win rookie of the year?
Probably the white one, because even though the black one has vastly superior numbers and had led his team to essentially identical regular season success with a much more difficult schedule, the white one just looks like a quarterback, doesn't he? I don't know for sure that race plays a part in this, but Jesus, what else would convince Fox (and plenty of other bozos out there) that the guy with the way shittier numbers is the better QB?
Here is how one voter's ballot is shaping up:
Coach of the year: Indianapolis' Chuck Pagano/Bruce Arians.
#CHUCKSTRONG!!!!! My opinion on Pagano has shifted as the year has gone on. That locker room speech he gave after week 6 or 7 or whenever was undoubtedly the douchechilliest moment of the season for me. You know the one, the highlight shows each played it like 12 times that evening. The one where he was yelling at his team about dancing with his daughters and their wedding. Look, I have no problem with Pagano and I am glad his disease is in remission, but holy balls. That speech was 80% idiotic football coach bravado and 20% heartfelt emotion, which, at least for me was a horrible mixture. That speech and the praise it got from waterhead ex-player tv pundits made me root against the Colts (not Pagano himself, obviously--I'm not THAT much of a hater).
There will be a lot of competition in this category, including Mike Shanahan,
That's rich. I'm pretty sure everything Shanahan has done when his QB was named something other than Elway or Griffin--particularly the job he did in Washington from 2009 through 2011--has solidified his status as a mediocre at best coach/personnel evaluator. If you have Dan Snyder writing checks for you and you go 15-33 over the course of your first three seasons (after the team went 9-7 and 8-8 in the two seasons preceding your hiring), you should absolutely be fired. I'm not sure why he should win an award for stumbling into one of the best pro-ready QBs to come out of college in the last thirty years. He deserves credit for trading up for the pick that enabled the Redskins to take Griffin. He deserves no "coach of the year" level credit for being the guy who walks the sidelines as Griffin wins games for him.
and Pete Carroll,
Might be my pick, but Pagano/Arians works too.
but no one endured what Pagano and Arians did. Few expected much from the Colts, who finished last season with two wins and the No. 1 overall draft pick. Pagano made the brilliant decision to hire Arians, whom Pittsburgh had cast aside,
That's all true, but shouldn't we consider giving the award to McCarthy for having more or less the exact same team that won the Super Bowl two seasons ago and won 15 games last year, and coaching them to 11-5 this year?
Offensive rookie of the year: Luck.
339/627, 4374 yards, 54.1% completions, 6.98 Y/A, 23 TDs, 18 INT, 76.5 QB rating, 11-5 record
258/393, 3200 yards, 65.6% completions, 8.14 Y/A, 20 TDs, 5 INT, 102.4 QB rating, 10-6 record
So the difference between them is that Luck accumulated 1000 more yards than Griffin and 3 more TDs on 200+ more attempts, and Griffin was so much more efficient that it's not even worth having a conversation about which of them is better. And this is isn't even factoring in Griffin's large edge in rushing. Give Griffin 600+ attempts and his numbers would absolutely put Luck's to shame. The difference between them is somewhat similar to the difference between Matthew Stafford and Aaron Rodgers this year-Stafford has way more attempts and thus more yards, and Rodgers is abundantly better in every other way. But yeah, go ahead, tell me about how great Luck was this year.
There was ample competition here, with Washington quarterback Robert Griffin III and Seattle Seahawks QB Russell Wilson each leading their teams to winning records with a chance to win their respective divisions.
Christ, even Wilson's numbers put Luck's to shame in every category other than total yards and lightness of skin pigment. Why would anyone pick Luck? I can't think of any theories other than the depressing one I've already floated. Anyone got any others? Plz share.
But look at Luck's numbers running a pro-style offense.
And there's the not-so-subtle dig at Griffin and Wilson--apparently they're not running "pro-style offenses." I haven't seen a ton of Seattle's games this year but I see plenty of Washington's and it's not like they're in the wishbone. Griffin probably takes 50-60% of his snaps from the pistol. Who gives a shit? The numbers are the numbers. Griffin isn't just an awesome running QB, he was also one of the best passers in the league this year. He was a significantly better passer than Luck. I wasn't aware that "number of snaps taken from under center" was an important input into MVP decisions.
In 15 games, he set the rookie record with 4,183 passing yards.
Plus, Luck has seven game-winning drives this season, and the Colts are in the playoffs.