Showing posts with label it is probably unfair to generalize that all cubs fans are boorish drunkards but i don't care. Show all posts
Showing posts with label it is probably unfair to generalize that all cubs fans are boorish drunkards but i don't care. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Heyman breaks down a trade, fails to understand the relative value of players involved, cashes another paycheck

[Note added after posting: as I am only marginally less fucking stupid than Jon Heyman, Chris W had to point out to me that the Cubs didn't even get $3 MM in salary relief. They've got to pay Volstad (or non-tender him, which wouldn't surprise me given how dumb the trade is in the first place) and he's arbitration eligible for the first time. Last year Jason Hammel and Kevin Slowey, two pitchers who are slightly better than Volstad but probably comparable, got 2 years $7.75 MM and 1/$2.7 MM respectively in their first years of eligibility. Put the bubbly on ice, Cubs fans. IT'S GONNA HAPPEN HOPEFULLY.]

As Theo Epstein frantically rushes to establish that the two BoSox titles of the '00s were not of his making (A damaged but talented Carlos Zambrano for a guy who might maybe be a #5 starter on his best day and $3 MM in salary relief? Hot sizzle!), Heyman provides this incisive analysis:

The agreed-upon trade between the Cubs and Marlins of volatile former star Carlos Zambrano for talented former phenom Chris Volstad

The word "talented" needs to be moved back in the sentence so that it's next to "volatile."

works for everyone.

In the sense that it works well for the Marlins.

The Cubs get rid of the volatile Zambrano, who had lost his friends in the clubhouse after losing is way on the mound last year.

Even if the Cubs never wanted him to start another game for them, he's still worth a hell of a lot more than Chris Volstad. It's essentially a contract year for Zambrano. He has a 2013 option that vests if he's in the top 4 in the 2012 Cy voting, in which case you'd like him on your team in 2013 anyways. Otherwise he's gone in 10 months. You eat $15 MM of his $18MM salary and all you get in return is Chris Volstad? Holy moly, how much were the Marlins going to pay if the Cubs asked for nothing but salary relief in return? What a crap trade.

The Marlins give up Volstad, whose great promise has seemed to dissipate the past few years to the point where he was an unacceptable 5-13 with a 4.89 ERA for the Marlins in 2011.

Yes, it "seemed" to dissipate since his very good rookie year in 2008. Since then he's had one sort of barely acceptable season, and two where he was replacement level or worse. 88 starts since the beginning of 2009, ERA just under 5 (in the NL, in a mild hitters park), WHIP over 1.40, bad strikeout numbers, cumulative WAR of 1. Can you say "future 6th/7th inning guy?"

This trade represents a fresh start for both right-handers.

That's true. Could you have thought up that angle on your own? Heyman hopes CBS doesn't think so.

Thursday, May 28, 2009

It Ain't Broke, and Rick Reilly is Just Enough of a Dumbass to Fix It

Although he's a real baggadouche, I usually shy away from ripping on Reilly's articles. But right now I have a bone to pick. A few days ago, he did something very personally offensive to me. Here's a rhetorical question: Is it possible to "jinx" a team which is a perennial loser, wasn't even expected to make the playoffs this year, and is more or less playing with the house's money by reaching the conference finals? Well, Rick was more than willing to find out when he wrote this article about how great it would be for the Denver Nuggets to win a championship this year. Don't get me wrong- my complaint isn't even about jinxes. I don't believe in them because I'm not a dipshit Cubs fan. It's about writing a moronic article about my favorite NBA team. I know Reilly, like me, is a Colorado native. But that doesn't give him carte blanche to write bullshit fluff articles about Colorado teams. STAY AWAY FROM MY ALLEGIANCES, REILLY. I FUCKING MEAN IT.

So, with that established, let's see how Rick would "fix" baseball. Because clearly it is broken.

I personally find baseball so crushingly boring I would happily plunge knitting needles into my eyes to avoid another snap zoom of Joe Torre's nostril hairs.

Where is the celebrity pop culture reference here? We're a whole one sentence in and he hasn't even mentioned Octomom or Bristol Palin. Couldn't he have said "I'd rather hear more about the Pitt-Jolie-Aniston love triangle than watch baseball!" and called it a day?

But my buddies like it, so I sit and watch with them. And bitch.

And talk about horse racing for hours, without realizing that it's entirely predicated on gambling and profit maximization.

"Why do all these ballparks have to be so precious?" I was opining the other night. "You take Houston's. Why does it have a rise in centerfield for no apparent reason? Why is there a train running along the fence? Any chance we could stick the architect under it? Why is the outfield wall in San Francisco made of five different substances and at five different heights? What is this, pachinko? I mean, if I were commissioner … "

This from a guy whose favorite sport is golf. The quintessential "unique venue" sport. How come the 17th green at Sawgrass is on a tiny island? Any chance we can drown Reilly in the adjoining lake?

And that's when my buddy spun around on me, red-faced, and yelled, "Tell you what! I hope you do end up commissioner! But until then, just shut up and watch the game!!!"

I was shocked into silence. Because I realized, "He thinks I could be commish!"

Well, to be fair, Bug Selig is probably on the short list of people who have done more to ruin my enjoyment of sports than Rick Reilly. So go for it, Rick. You're (somehow) the lesser of two evils here.

And so, I am hereby announcing my candidacy. Bud Selig is, what, 108? And here are the things I'll change before I even hang my coat on the door peg:

1) More puns. 2) More stories about parapalegic blind kids who made a free throw this one time. 3) More Britney Spears.

1) We'll put in a pitch clock. The reason baseball is slower than cold honey tipped over is that there's no clock when men are on base.

There is already a rule for this. I think it's something like 20 seconds between pitches. It is never enforced because most baseball fans don't care. I'd say the real reason for games getting longer and longer is the ever-expanding amount of time between half innings, so that teams and MLB can cram in as many commercials as possible. I can't prove that, but strongly suspect it's the case. Anyways, my counter-solution to this problem: give Rick more shiny things to play with if and when he's watching a game.

You get 10 seconds to shoot a free throw. Golf penalizes you for taking more than 40 seconds over a shot. A chair umpire takes a point from a player who uses more than 25 seconds to serve after a dead ball.

All of these are always enforced. Always.

But umps let hitters step out of the box to readjust their socks, belts, sleeves, gloves, jerseys and helmets -- after a ball!

FUCK YOU, JETER.

They let pitchers fuss endlessly with their rosin bags, the rubber and their eternally askew cups, while we fans decide which of our peanuts resemble presidents.

Or celebrities!

But with my 15-second pitch clock, we get the hitter in the box, the pitcher on the mound and everybody in their homes by 10 p.m. We get two-hour-15-minute games instead of four-hour sunburns. We get World Series games that kids can see end. And not a dime of ad money is lost!

Yeah, wouldn't want to upset that little arangement. Lord knows MLB has been hemorrhaging money for years. God forbid any solution to this "problem" of game length prevent me from watching at least 90 minutes of Cialis commercials during every broadcast.

2) Once a week, every player signs autographs for 10 minutes by the dugout.

How else is Rick going to get fodder for saccarhine-sweet stories about how swell it is when athletes are nice?

Don't tell me you're too busy, Mr. Seven-Car Garage. I've seen you elbows-deep in the clubhouse porn stash.

That sounds an awful lot like jealousy. Quit bogarting all the porn, Ichiro.

3) We'll bring in Olympic testing. Saying "baseball players cheat" is like saying "wolves like hamburger."

It's like saying Lindsay Lohan likes media attention!

In the Small-Balls era, nobody -- not the players, not the owners, not the writers -- tried to stop it. Where were all these books when we needed them?

I don't know, Smartpants. Why weren't you writing one?

But when I bring in the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) -- and let it test anytime, road or home -- we'll finally see who's faker than Octomom's lips.

Finally with the pop culture. Jeez. Thought he was never going to get there.

4) If you're 0-for-4, the crowd picks your at-bat music. Is it my fault if they choose "Nothing From Nothing" by Billy Preston?

Hooooooo! Now there's something that could really entertain fans who find the game boring. Counter-solution: any song Rick likes is removed from all stadium sing catalogs across the league.

5) The National League will get the DH. No more pitchers swinging a bat at a ball the way Paris Hilton swings a shovel at a moth.

OMG Paris! Now we're on a roll. Have to disagree with Rick here, though. If you're the kind og scholar who thinks baseball is boring, you should probably prefer to see the comedy that can ensue when a pitcher tries to hit. It's a refreshing change of pace I would think.

6) We'll fine more players. The NFL fines guys $5,000 for not having their socks right. Nuggets forward Kenyon Martin got a $25,000 fine for shoving a guy. But often, Selig yawns when pitchers throw 95 mph retaliation beanballs. You want to brain a guy just because he stood in the box after his moon shot? Okay. We'll fine you until your kids end up in public school.

I hate to get all serious in my criticism of this article, but again, the same logic as above applies. So Rick is bored by baseball- and he thinks that removing beanballs from the game will change that? He should love beanballs and brawls. They're awesome. Or maybe he 1) wants to see more crazy home run celebrations and thus wants to remove any obstacle that prevents their happening or 2) doesn't expect pitchers to throw fewer beanballs if this rule were put into effect, he just thinks fines are really exciting.

7) Umps will be in charge of rainouts year round, not the home team. I'm sick of seeing a full house soak for two hours 59 minutes waiting for the manager to get word from his owner to call it, just because the greedball wants to sell more $9 beers. We'll put Double Doppler 9000 in the umps' room, and they'll decide in under an hour.

Counter-solution: any fans who stick around through the duration of a rainout get their ticket refunded with money from Rick's outrageous salary. I hate greedy owners. But his 5 year, $10 million contract with ESPN is far more offensive to me than any $8 slice of pizza or $6 churro ever could be.

8) Balls that hit the foul pole are foul. Duh.

First time anyone's ever made that joke. I'm pretty sure Rick owes royalties to Ernest Thayer on it.

9) A prospect won't be allowed to enter an MLB farm system until he's the age of a college sophomore, just like in the NBA. Over the years, I've noticed most baseball players are dumber than toe lint.

Athletes in other pro sports are totally different though. You can just tell when the average NBA or NFL player is being interviewed that those 1-4 years he spent pretending to be in college have drastically raised his intelligence level.

This is because many of them report to the minors even before graduating high school.

(whispered) Pssst! He's talking about players from Latin America! (spoken) So, making them play amateur ball for a year or two before being drafted is clearly the answer.

10) And most important, if you're the dweeb fan on your cell behind home plate waving at the camera, the rest of your section gets to pour beer down your shorts.

Well we can all agree on that.

Now shut up and watch the game.

Will do. Just as soon as you quit your job, agree to never work in the sports media ever again, donate any money you've made in that field to charity, and print a retraction for everything you've ever written.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Chronicling the Possible Collapse: The Nature of the Cubs' Fan Base

Let's talk about sports and the media.

The Chicago Tribune - a subsidiary of the Tribune Company that owns the Chicago Cubs - keeps up a steady stream of coverage to keep the Cubs' legions of fans sated with information. Since the Cubs' latest antics includes losing eight of their last nine, it's certainly the job of the Tribune's reporters to bring the grim news to the once-happy fans.

What's awesome/hilarious/terrible [depending on who you are] - is the manner in which they do it. Now, the Cubs, in case you didn't know, have a history of inept collapses. It's true - lots of teams have blown leads. The 1951 Dodgers, 1993 Giants and 2007 Mets are legendary for blowing leads. Here's an interesting article that looks at the statistical numbers - suggesting, actually, that the 1995 Angels were the biggest "chokers". Over the course of a hundred years of baseball, for every comeback team, there's a comeback victim.

But the best part about the Cubs' possible collapse, from the perspective of a non-Cubs fan, is watching the sharks swim around the damaged ship. They're circling - noting every little piece of evidence - that might bring down the ship. Until August 29, that ship had sailed quite pleasantly - running up to the tune of 85-50 and a .629 winning pct. But the recent spread of losses - which could easily be attributed by any sane fan to a small sampling of bad luck to an otherwise good team - has sent their writers into a frenzy.

Here are five recent media reports focusing on the Cubs' performance recently. Though some of them do contain real, thoughtful analysis of the Cubs' slide, a lot of them are full of some really awful claims.

Sample #1: Steve Rosenbloom's Tribune blog from Tuesday 9/9

And if it isn’t the specter of ’69 and the Cubs actually make the postseason,

Here's why I call hysteria on all this: the Cubs still have a 98.91% chance of making the playoffs according to PECOTA's projections. Wondering if "the Cubs actually make it" is completely nuts, Steve.

then Cubs fans rip open the scabs of ‘84 and ‘03

Jeez. That's some nasty prose.

and maybe even last year when manager Lou Piniella got all cute and yanked his best pitcher to keep him fresh for a game that still hasn’t been played.

LOLOL I GET IT! THE CUBS STILL HAVEN'T MADE LAST YEAR'S PLAYOFFS! I HAVE A ROCK IN MY SHOE! I AM DOING SUCH A SHIT JOB HERE!

That’s the way Cubs fans work, and wouldn’t that be a fascinating double-blind psychological study: Self-hating, death-wish Cubs fans -- nature or nurture?

Good question, Steve. I suggest you enlist Northwestern's graduate school of psychology to answer this question. Here, I'll save you the trouble: they are nurtured - by the sky-is-falling rhetoric of people like you.

Sample #2: Paul Sullivan, Tribune writer; "Scariest Thought for Cubs? 1969"

He carefully notes five similarities between the 1969 Cubs (who went 8-17 in September) and the 2008 Cubs. This includes such spurious comparisons as "ABSENT MANAGERS: Durocher skipped out to Camp Ojibwa and Pinella got lost!" - failing to note the clear distinction between a deliberately-absent manager going AWOL and a manager accidentally getting lost on a road trip. It's this kind of nonsense that - literally - spawns more of the Cub-curse nonsense. If I were a Cubs fan, I'd be insulted by this kind of spurious reasoning, but maybe that explains why I'm too smart to be a Cubs fan.

Sullivan closes with this doozy:
But if you see a black cat on the field at Shea Stadium when the Cubs make their final visit there in two weeks, prepare for a long winter

LOL BLACK CATS ARE EVIL AND BAD AND ONE WAS ON THE FIELD IN 1969.

Sample #3: Dave van Dyck's Postgame report on the Cubs' 4-3 loss to the Reds on Sunday

CINCINNATI - For those who believe in such things, the reason Ronny Cedeno went from hero to goat Sunday might have been that infamous billy goat's footprint changing the direction of a high-hopping ball near second base.

Wow. They let the goat walk on the field in between innings or something?

Even for those who don't believe the Cubs are eternally doomed, Sunday would give them pause.

If you don't believe in this sort of superstitious/divine/karmic nonsense, Sunday would give you enough pause enough to realize that the Cubs are still in first place by a large margin.

After losing seven of eight games, including Sunday's 4-3 stinker to the Reds, it is understandable that the mentality has evolved into a sky-is-falling September swoon.

No, it isn't. It's never understandable. It's only understandable because idiots like you keep writing this stuff - and the Cub fan base is either too comatose (from drinking) or too ignorant to call you on it.

Sample #4: Dave van Dyck's Article on the Cubs' Remaining Schedule

Most Cubs fans, at least those with a knowledge of history, are already climbing the figurative staircase to the top floor for the jump.

I like how he doesn't say "all" Cubs fans, because that probably wouldn't be true. I think, like Dave does, that most Cubs fans are idiots and would probably climb a figurative staircase and walk to the figurative ledge and consider figurative suicide even when their team is not-figuratively in a position where it is 98.9% likely that they will make the playoffs.

LOL GOOD THING ITS NOT A REAL STAIRCASE MAN THAT WOULD BE BAD

Losses in seven of eight games? A manager so upset he can't talk? Two pitchers hurting, an offense sputtering, the Cardinals waiting?

The Cardinals have an elimination number of eleven. And it's September 10. You are a hysterical moron.

Yes, yes, yes, but there's also a reality side to what's going on, which means the staircase can be used to get to the ground floor as well, although Cubs fans rarely realize it.


Criticizing your own fans in your column for a disease-ridden hysteria that you help create? Awesome! Nice work, Dave!

Dave also mentions some useful points - such as the Cubs' most-difficult-remaining schedule and the fragile arms and brains of Cubs pitchers. He presents a series of "panic" and "not-panic" scenarios like a "point" and "counterpoint" argument - with each ludicrous "panic" argument balanced by a reasonable "don't panic" argument. It's like Dave's inner self, fighting his intuition's desire to weep with his reason's cool logic.

Sample #5: 'Federal Agent Arrested At Reds Game' - WCPO-TV, Cincinnati

According to court records, when a concession employee working the View Level at Great American Ball Park refused to serve alcohol to 26-year-old Rafael Rosario, the Cubs fan asked two more times.

When Cincinnati Police asked to see Rosario’s I.D., he tensed up and claimed he was a federal agent and the officer had no right to see his I.D.

Records show Rosario is employed by the Transportation Safety Administration at O’Hare Airport in Chicago.

Police say he gave them an Illinois state drivers license, not a federal I.D. Police note Rosario, who was wearing a red Cubs shirt and blue Cubs hat, refused to cooperate with officers and had blood shot eyes and smelled of alcohol.



This has nothing to do with sports journalism. I just think it's hilarious.

I have no problem with using a really small sample size (read: one drunk Cubs fan) to generalize to the entire population of Cubs fans (millions of people, including a large portion of my family and friends) and call them a legion of drunken ignoramuses.

Because that's probably the only group of people that would tolerate this kind of writing.