Sunday, July 20, 2008

Rainbows and Ponies and Bright Rays of Sunshine......Yay!

Friends, it's time to hear more about the greatest All-Star who ever lived. Sure, most All-Stars put up great stats or have a great career backing them up. But this guy made the team this year without the unfair advantage of either of those things. All he needed to make it was......get this....a Red Sox jersey and a little letter called "C". It's time for justice. Richard Justice.

No offense, but Red Sox need to keep Varitek
Despite catcher's slump at plate, team can't afford to lose his presence


Fine. Make him the bench coach. The current bench coach might have a shot at managing a .224 EqA, which would top Varitek. Put him at catcher.

Let's see these fine reasons that the Red Sox absolutely can't lose this man, nay, legend.

Can you imagine Jason Varitek wearing any other uniform? Can't do it, can you?

Nope. I honestly can't. Therefore, keeping him is an outstanding business decision.

"That would be hard," Derek Jeter said.

This evidence is just overwhelming.

How about you, Mariano Rivera?

"He's their captain," he said. "That tells you what he means to them."

Indeed.


Not 1, but 2 Yankees on your side? I better just cut this article off right here.

"When you think of the Red Sox, he's one of the people that comes to mind," Joe Torre said.

That's one man's opinion. I frequently forget about him. When my team is about to play the Red Sox, I'm like, "Shit....they've got Manny and Ortiz and Beckett and Dice-K and Drew and Pedroia and.....oh yeah...that catcher."

Wait, there's more.

Oh go on. I'm giddy.

"It's the way he plays the game, the respect he has for the game," Josh Hamilton said.

Josh Hamilton has spent one half of a season playing in the same league as Jason Varitek. He played 4 games against him in April. But, it's a little-known fact that addictedheroinoutofbaseballcrackcocainemiraculousrecoverylastyearmajortradehittersparkZOMG28homers! So basically, everything he touches turns to gold and everything he says has a powerful meaning that transcends the way people think.

For a decade, Varitek has represented the Red Sox with grace and grit. He might be the poster boy for some of the best years the franchise has ever had -- six playoff appearances, including two championships, in 10 seasons.

I would pick a different poster boy. But yeah, there really isn't much denying any of this.

He has helped changed the way people perceive the Red Sox.

I'll put this in a way that makes this sentence less misleading.

Jason Varitek, along with people who are way better at baseball and way more important to the goal that I will mention in the next part of this sentence, has helped change the way people perceive the Red Sox.

Once lovable losers, they're now widely respected both for winning and for doing it the right way.

And if like, A.J. Pierzynski was their catcher all this time, there's no way that franchise would have ever tuned around, right?

He's not the only Red Sox player who typifies this approach.

Whew. For a second there, I thought you wouldn't give credit to anyone else.

Tim Wakefield, Mike Lowell, Mike Timlin and others provide a leadership core as solid as any in the game.

Good God. I want to play against you in a one-on-one fantasy baseball league for $2,000,000 in which both people are only allowed to draft Red Sox.

That "C" on Varitek's jersey speaks volumes. He's the Red Sox captain in every sense of the word.

So if you have a choice between cutting Varitek and J.D. Drew from the Red Sox, you're cutting Drew, aren't you.

Recently, when he briefly snapped out of a terrible slump with a hit, the Red Sox celebrated as if they'd won another championship.

This is just another terrific reason to keep him on the team after this season.

Varitek's future with the Red Sox has become a hot topic on Boston sports radio at a time when he's hitting .218 and sometimes looking overmatched at the plate.

Because he is 36 years old, because he is unsigned after this season and because the Red Sox have had acquiring a catcher on their to-do list for more than a year, the previously unthinkable has become thinkable.


But....but he's the captain!

Money could become an issue. Varitek is represented by Scott Boras, and rumors have Boras seeking a four-year contract for Varitek.

Purchasing that contract would be something like buying a baseball team a coffin. You really want him catching for you when he's 40? And if he's not catching, then he has a value less than zero.

To anyone Red Sox fan ready to throw Varitek off the bus: Be careful what you wish for.

I'm not sure any fans have ever regretted wishing their team had a starting catcher that hits like a major leaguer.

When the Red Sox trailed the Cleveland Indians 3-1 in the American League Championship Series last fall, Varitek was one of the guys who set a relentless one-game-at-a-time tone in the clubhouse.

That's why the Red Sox outscored the Indians 30-5 in the last 3 games of this series. The ol' one-game-at-a-time approach. You didn't catch those Red Sox trying to win Game 7 during Game 5. No sir-ee-bob.

Had you walked into the Boston clubhouse before Game 5, you might have thought the Red Sox were preparing for a June game with the Mariners. That's because they play the game one way -- and Varitek is partly responsible for that.

What is that way? Indifference? They approach Game 5 of the ALCS with the same fervor as a meaningless June game with the Mariners? If you ask me, that's a serious problem.

There's no debating his offensive season. It has been terrible. Varitek's .218 batting average is 46 points below his career average. He's hitting just .184 on the road and .192 with runners in scoring position. He has put together back-to-back tough months -- a .122 average in June, a .188 average in July.

This is very, very bad.

And yet at this point in his career, considering the makeup of this club, offense isn't his primary responsibility.

You are a major league baseball player who is not a pitcher. Offense better fucking be your primary responsibility.

Even with Varitek not hitting, the Red Sox are second in the American League in runs, first in on-base percentage and third in home runs.

Therefore, keep Varitek.

As for Varitek, it might be impossible for an outsider to understand his impact in the clubhouse.

Aren't you an outsider?

What Varitek mainly does is set a tone for everyone else. When his peers voted him onto the American League All-Star team, he was asked over and over if he felt bad about going when he's hitting so little.

"No," he said. "That's a pretty good honor, to be sent by the players."

Sometimes Francona seems to know the questions are coming before they're asked.

"That is from the players around the league," he said. "That's how they feel about him."


Basically, him getting on the team was the rest of the players saying, "We don't like A.J. Pierzynski." That's all that was.

So here are the reasons that the Red Sox should keep Jason Varitek. Ahem.

1) You can't picture Jason Varitek wearing another uniform, and neither can Derek Jeter.
2) When Joe Torre thinks of the Red Sox, he's one of the first people that comes to mind.
3) Josh Hamilton says so.
4) He is a symbol of the good years the Red Sox have had (years when he wasn't old and a pretty solid player).
5) He changed the way people perceived the Red Sox.
6) There is a "C" on his jersey.
7) He believes in playing one game at a time.
8) The rest of the Red Sox are hitting just great, aren't they?
9) He's not good at offense, but that doesn't matter because of (8) and offense isn't his primary responsibility.
10) R-E-S-P-E-C-T.

I hope to God the Red Sox sign 37-year-old Jason Varitek next offseason. Because I hate them and I want them to lose.

13 comments:

  1. I think Chad Finn over at Boston Globe said it best with "The way Varitek calls a game, and handles the pitching staff, is our version of Jeters intangibles".
    I dont think your dream of the sox signing him to 4 years will come true, because this regime actually has common sense (except for Lugo, but every team has bad signings).
    I agree, though. Varitek is extremely overrated, and should not have not been voted onto the all star team.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've never seen a catcher get so much credit for "handling" the pitching staff. I find it hard to believe that there would be an appreciable drop in the performance of Boston's pitchers if they were throwing to another catcher. And frankly, I'd find it absurd and insulting if I was a Boston pitcher.

    Reporter-"Hey, Josh Becket, you just had another stellar playoff performance. What do you have to say?"

    Becket-"Well, Varitek just handled me so well today. Any pitcher could have had the same performance. It had nothing to do with my location and changes of pace. All credit should go to Jason."

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't know if this "regime" of the Red Sox has that much sense. They are not stupid but they did resign Schilling in the offseason and he may never pitch again, sign Lugo, Matt Clement, and Coco Crisp. They just did a good job replenishing the farm system, so it has been able to cover what mistakes they have made so far.

    I think it is interesting how a sportswriter from Boston is not able to report the sports from a neutral perspective and says, "our" when talking about the Red Sox, like he is a part of the team. You don't need to bash the team like Mariotti but you certainly could not use "our" in a sentence like you are a fan boy.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As much as this writer overrates Jason Varitek, there are worse people out there.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous said... "I've never seen a catcher get so much credit for "handling" the pitching staff."

    Really? I have heard that often. Some catchers are best known for their ability to "handle" a pitching staff. Carlton Fisk comes to mind, as does Mike Piazza. Piazza was bad defensively but supposedly was good with the pitchers. It may be overrated, and it may be difficult to prove to someone who doesn't want to believe it, but some pitchers say the catcher makes a difference.
    I would say he is overrated when he is supposed to be such a valuable guy but last year the Red Sox had to make a desperate trade to bring back a catcher for Wakefield. If Varitek is so great he ought to be able to handle all of the pitchers, including the knuckleballers.

    ReplyDelete
  6. OMG! You have no idea what you're talking about! Look at his baseball card and you'll realize that Tek is a SWITCH HITTER! Do you know how valuable that is? While ur at it, check out Beckett and Schilling B4 they became Sawx! They sucked! Now look at how kickass they r! All Star, yes and future HOFer too! If I were Sawx management I would immediately sign him to a 6 year extension! I am just glad he finally is getting some press. He gets ignored since he plays relative obscurity! Go RS Nation and go Tek!

    ReplyDelete
  7. ben,

    He didnt mean it from a fan boy perspective. he wrote an article about how the sox should not resign Varitek, and the commenters were saying all the bullshit about how they should keep him because he calls a good game. That was his response to them. Sorry, I should have clarified it better. He was mocking the people that say that.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You know a player is useless when the best things you can say about him involve his "grit", "hustle", "approach to the game", and "the way he handles pitchers."

    Notice how his offensive contributions are pushed aside, due to the fact that the Sox are still one of the best offensive teams in baseball. You know why they're one of the best offensive teams in baseball? Because the other 8 guys in the lineup AREN'T JASON VARITEK.

    It's retarded. If you had nine guys like Jason Varitek in your lineup, all that grit and hustle and intangibility would make you the worst offensive team in the majors, maybe in history. But hey, sign him for four more years, goodness knows the Red Sox need some more grit!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous #2- I vomited in my mouth a little when I saw that Jason Varitek web site.

    Anonymous #1 - Yeah, I've heard that whole credit for handling a pitching staff thing before. The one guy who I've heard it most about is Jason Kendall. Coincidentally, he, like Varitek this season, has absolutely nothing else to offer. I'm in the tonus camp in believing that it's a slap in the face to have that written about you, because that means there's nothing else positive to write. What catcher in the Major Leagues is considered bad at handling pitchers? Michael Barrett maybe?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Let's just take this from a Yankees fan perspective, i.e. mine. I would be nothing less than ecstatic if the Sox signed Varitek to a 4-year deal. The guy stinks. He's had some decent years, but those days are past. I was watching that recent game where Varitek got a hit to "bust out" of a slump. It was a bloop hit, a little parachute into right field that should probably have been caught. Drove in the winning run against Arizona. Yippee. Give that man a contract!
    And as far as Jeter's "intangibles" go...fuck Jeter's intangibles. Nobody is a bigger Yankees fan than I am, and I was sick of hearing that shit back in 1998. Don't give me intangibles. Hit a goddamn homerun once in a while. Stop grounding into double plays. Stop striking out with a man on third and one out. Make a play to your left. Display adequate range in the field. Intangibles are shit.
    I like Chad Finn, but his rationalization for keeping Varitek is idiotic. Likening Varitek's reason for existing to Jeter's supposed intangibles is a battle of odious comparisons.

    Varitek does have an awesomely fierce haircut, though.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Fred, that makes a whole lot more sense. I was amazed that he said it like he was a fan boy. This is probably why I should have googled and found the article and read it. Thanks for the explanation.

    John, if you don't absolutely love Jeter and are not willing to put your life on the line to save his...then I will never believe you are a Yankees fan. There is no way there is a Yankees fan in the world that believes Jeter is not God.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Let me retract my slur on Chad Finn's reputation. I should have read through all of the comments.

    Ben- Make no mistake, I do love Jeter. He's my favorite player. It's just that I also have a realistic assessment of his shortcomings and a clear recognition of how irritating the media/Jeter love affair is.

    He's not the greatest player in the world, like some people think. He is a Hall of Fame level shortstop though, in spite of not being Ozzie Smith in the field. He's an excellent player for my favorite team, he's been with the same team for his entire career, and his tenure dovetails with my growth as a baseball fan. It doesn't mean I think the sun shines out his ass.

    It's like family. You can love your family, but you still have to be critical of them. If you lose objectivity, then what do you have? I absolutely can't stand the ballwashing that Jeter gets from the media. I have many friends who are Yankee fans, and they feel the same way that I do. Maybe I'm just lucky, and I know the right Yankee fans. It probably also helps to live on the other side of the country from the team.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I was being sarcastic and I knew you probably did love Jeter but have to be objective and I think you do a good job of it. I was just saying it is heresay to not love Derek Jeter among Yankees fans but maybe I don't know the right Yankees fans or don't ask the right questions. I probably just don't ask the right questions.

    I do think he is a Hall of Fame shortstop, especially when compared to Ozzie Smith. I have a lot of respect for Ozzie but because of him Omar Vizquel is going to get in the HoF.

    ReplyDelete