tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6300012139741038635.post7684970548137775112..comments2024-02-16T02:12:08.305-08:00Comments on Fire Jay Mariotti: This is Nitpicky, But.....Larry Bhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16141943214237719821noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6300012139741038635.post-14977471352595171322007-12-04T09:25:00.000-08:002007-12-04T09:25:00.000-08:00I call shenanigans. That's a blatant ripoff of Goo...I call shenanigans. That's a blatant ripoff of Good Guy at Sports' schtick. See <A HREF="http://goodguyatsports.blogspot.com/2007/10/jon-heyman-7-chance-that-rod-retires-or.html" REL="nofollow"> here</A> or <A HREF="http://goodguyatsports.blogspot.com/2007/10/two-minus-three-equals-negative-fun.html" REL="nofollow"> here</A>.<BR/><BR/>Whatever happened to honor amongst bloggers?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6300012139741038635.post-15640734270814358792007-12-02T10:39:00.000-08:002007-12-02T10:39:00.000-08:00I know, very nitpicky, wasn't really slamming Heym...I know, very nitpicky, wasn't really slamming Heyman or anything....Derpsaucehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08881690667013390019noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6300012139741038635.post-68235640077670295912007-12-02T08:54:00.000-08:002007-12-02T08:54:00.000-08:00Way too nitpicky, I'd say. He obviously was cogniz...Way too nitpicky, I'd say. He obviously was cognizant of them needing to add up to 100%, but also wanted to have round numbers. Sure to be perfectly correct, he should have had 7.0055342:1 or whatever, but what purpose would that serve?<BR/><BR/>You can find some of these where the odds at up to like 85% or much greater than 100%. Pick those guys apart, not Heyman.NickPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06344700014221969116noreply@blogger.com